Democrats Protect Terrorists
The roll call and more updates.
Every single "nay" vote was a Democrat (plus one lefty independent).
This is totally unacceptable.
Whose side are they on?
As you will recall, a group of imams made deliberately provocative acts on an airline in order to provoke complaints about them, after which they could have a press conference to whine about profiling, to promote the "end racial profiling act."
And they went further, with the Saudi-backed terror front group CAIR (now officially named as unindicted co-conspirators with known terror groups by federal prosecutors) then actually attempting to sue the passengers who reported their behavior.
The purpose is to make it easier for real terrorists to carry out their acts without interference from you, the intended victim.
Sit down and shut up is their message, or you will be sued and branded a racist.
And the Democrats in Congress agree.
I have written my Senators as below.
What is wrong with these people?
Dear Senator Dodd,I tried really, really hard to be polite.
I must say I am shocked appalled that you voted against the "John Doe" amendment to protect airline passengers from frivolous and chilling lawsuits if they report suspicious behavior.
Even the thought of having to defend one's self against CAIR (now officially named as "unindicted co-conspirators" of known terror groups) could cause a hesitation that separates life from death.
If Congress wishes to retreat from the hot war, at least it should help fight against terror on the law-enforcement front!
I am stunned.
Whose side are you on? This vote, whatever your reasoning, makes it look like you represent the Saudis rather than U.S. citizens, who are the targets of terror.
What is wrong with Congress? Why are you people making it harder for citizens to protect themselves from mass murder?
You must fix this.
Keep up the fight. Tell your government how you feel about this. Be sure to check the roll call above to see how they voted.
Don't these people fly?